Saturday 29 December 2018

Firefighters extinguish two simultaneous fires in Northeast Portland

A Portland Fire and Rescue engine sits parked in Southeast Portland. (

Portland Fire & Rescue had its hands full Saturday afternoon, as two fires broke out in Northeast Portland at the same time.

Firefighters were first called to the Union Motel on Northeast Gertz Road shortly after 1 p.m. as heavy smoke poured from the motel office, the Fire Bureau said in a news release Saturday. Initial reports indicated that somebody might still be trapped inside, but a search found that everyone had made it out of the building safely.

Investigators are trying to determine the cause of the fire, which started in the office.

While crews were still at the motel, a second fire broke out at an apartment building on Northeast Wygant Street, about seven miles away. When firefighters arrived, they saw smoke rising from the back of the building, according to the fire bureau. Firefighters found a blaze in the bedroom of an apartment.

The initial report was that a resident had stayed inside to put out the flames, but everyone made it out safely as crews extinguished the fire.

Portland Fire & Rescue is taking the opportunity to remind people to “get out and stay out” when a fire breaks out. Returning to a burning structure to retrieve items, save pets or help put out the blaze can be life threatening, the bureau said.

Source Article

The post Firefighters extinguish two simultaneous fires in Northeast Portland appeared first on C FARMACEUTICO.


Visit to Learn More: http://www.correfarmaceutico.com/firefighters-extinguish-two-simultaneous-fires-in-northeast-portland/

Sunday 16 December 2018

Portland’s Odd Couple Knows Exactly What It Wants

To Jusuf Nurkic, the rim suddenly closed tight. The 7-foot, 275-pound Bosnian center had been traded to Portland less than two weeks earlier, liberated, really, from Denver’s bench. He needed the Trail Blazers and hoped to immediately impress. Against Toronto that night in February 2017, his easy bunnies fumbled around the rim and against the backboard. He looked around at everything and nothing, muttering to himself.

"No, stop," Blazers star guard Damian Lillard told Nurkic. "I don’t want to hear that s–t anymore. We’re not making excuses tonight."

As much as Nurkic needed the Blazers, Lillard recognized the team needed Nurkic. They had been floundering, hitting the All-Star break at 10 games below .500. The lottery seemed a more realistic destination than the playoffs when Portland made the deal for Nurkic.

Lillard had offered Nurkic some breathing room for a couple of days following the trade. Now, though, he needed his new teammate’s focused play. So Lillard let Nurkic know the clouds would eventually part and the ball would start falling. He went out of his way to get him the ball that game.

"It means the world to me, man," Nurkic says. "I’m from Bosnia, a small country, three, almost four million [people]. To me, it’s like a dream to have a superstar, and he kinda takes you under his … wing for whatever you need. "

Lillard remembers telling Nurkic the organization accepted him and wanted to help him advance as a player. "Once that happened, he just opened up," Lillard says in a conversation a few days before Thanksgiving. "I felt like he needs somebody to be in his corner because it seemed like they didn’t support him there, so I just decided I was going to be in his corner and he opened up to me and we hit it off from there."

Since Nurkic’s arrival, the Trail Blazers have gone 82-54. This season they find themselves, as usual, bunched in a clogged Western Conference. While last spring’s flameout in the first round to the lower-seeded Pelicans prompted a lot of talk of changing the roster, the club has opted, for now, to run it back with essentially the same group. Improvement, the type that allows for a playoff series win, will need to come internally. For that, the organization is looking for Nurkic to become a third pillar alongside Lillard and CJ McCollum.

The club tried to express its faith he could do it in agreeing to a four-year, $48 million extension with the 24-year-old veteran over the summer, a deal that should allow Nurkic to play without looking over his massive shoulders.

"You always want to see people that trust in you, and you got to earn it one way or another," Nurkic says, adding: "You want to feel the communication."

He grew up in Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina, the son of a police officer, Hariz, and homemaker, Rusmina. "He was a cop, man," Nurkic says of his father. "Got a big ass car."

Jusuf Nurkic is big. His father, Nurkic cannot emphasize enough, is BIG. The legend goes that Hariz once expressed an interest in basketball, but no one could locate shoes large enough for him.

"Well, actually, that’s his story, so I need to believe him," Jusuf says. "Trust, man, you will, too. He’s big. … He never looks fat. He’s just big. His bones and everything. He’s … almost something like compared to Shaq right now. He’s just a big dude. You can’t even stand against him. You feel small."

His father made the news for a fight that landed 14 people injured. He remained standing. Enes Trnovcevic, an agent reading about the incident, located Hariz and asked him one question: Did he, by any chance, have a son?

Trnovcevic offered to train Jusuf in Slovenia, telling the 14-year-old that he was the best basketball player born in 1994. That dude is on drugs, Nurkic recalls thinking. "I’d barely ever touched a ball," he says.

Hariz insisted that his son open himself up to the possibility. Nurkic relented.

He went from hardly touching a basketball to living the sport in Slovenia. He practiced and trained relentlessly while trying to familiarize himself with a new language in a new country. Can I do this? Maybe not, he would think to himself some nights.

"People don’t get it when you’re young and you’ve never been away from your family, your father, mother or anybody close to you," Nurkic says. "You’ve never been, really, a day without them and then you going like [a] six-hour drive to another country. It’s, like, a big transition, especially [for] a kid. … It was hard. It was struggling, man. You’re just out there by yourself and you basically need to grow up overnight."

Nurkic made it through that year and returned as a growth spurt began kicking in. He had made friends. He learned the language. He became comfortable.

Oh yeah, he started thinking. This is something I want in my life. This sport is changing me and my whole life. The future was different.

By the time he was 18, he signed his first professional contract with Croatia’s Cedevita Zagreb.

"Players … would set illegal screens and there’s no offensive fouls and there’s no three seconds out there; like, people being in the paint," Nurkic says. "People play physical. That’s why you have like 50, 60 points a game. There is [nobody] who can score 50 a night. He going to the hospital that night, for sure."

Nurkic became frustrated, though, backing up Cedevita veterans and was loaned to Zadar. There, he teamed with Romeo Travis, a high school teammate of LeBron James, and tried soaking in as much English as possible from the Ohioan. "I thought the most important thing for me was just listen to him and [talk] to him for days and days and the whole season," Nurkic says.

On the court, he flourished and helped defeat Cedevita in the semifinals of the Croatian Premier League playoffs in 2013. He returned to Cedevita and started noticing NBA personnel in the stands.

"You start [to] realize that something [is] going to happen," Nurkic says. "You might have a chance to play in the NBA. You wanna stay on the ground and focus on what you need to do, but at the end of the day, you start to realize it’s true."

In 2014, the Bulls drafted Nurkic with the 16th overall pick and then dealt him to Denver. Nurkic had questions about Denver’s intentions. The Nuggets already had a crowded frontcourt. Midway through his first season, though, the club traded away centers JaVale McGee and Timofey Mozgov, moves that opened playing time for Nurkic. "I was confident before and I know I can play, but the more important thing was like, Can they see that?" Nurkic says.

Jusuf Nurkic and Gary Harris were both drafted by the Bulls in 2014, but were traded that same night to the Denver Nuggets for Doug McDermott, Anthony Randolph and a future second-round pick.

Things changed quickly in that first offseason. A torn patellar tendon required surgery in May 2015. Mike Malone replaced Brian Shaw as the team’s coach, and Nikola Jokic arrived that June.

Malone tried playing both at the same time to ill-fitting results in today’s smaller NBA. "They basically cannibalized one another," Portland general manager Neil Olshey says. Nurkic requested a trade in April 2016, only to relent and return for another season. The combination still clashed, so Malone brought Nurkic off the bench, a situation he found to be untenable. He started being held out of games altogether, openly sulking, and again asked to be traded. He had lost trust in the franchise.

"It’s tough to understand what the organization is trying to do with you and how much you’re important for the future," Nurkic says. "We just want to hoop, man. Pretty much you want to hoop every night, but in the end, you didn’t have that much patience. You just want things to happen overnight."

Shortly before the 2017 trade deadline, Denver dealt Nurkic and a first-round draft pick to Portland for Mason Plumlee and a second-round pick.

"Everything was kind of perfectly set up," Nurkic says.

By the time Nurkic arrived in Portland, the Trail Blazers were in the middle of a retrofitting of sorts. The team had been built around the career arcs of LaMarcus Aldridge and Lillard, but when Aldridge left for San Antonio in free agency in 2015, the plan needed recalibration.

Olshey asked Lillard to talk.

"We’re going to hit the reset button," Olshey told his remaining star. "We’re going to bring in young guys. We’re going to have to Moneyball it a little bit by finding guys that have been a little bit overlooked or forgotten by other organizations, so they’re not going to be flashy signings. We’re going to have to take some fliers. We’re going to have to build a culture and we’re going to have to be patient."

Olshey told Lillard he planned to build around him for the long haul. He asked if Lillard would be ready or even want the responsibility.

"It takes a lot of your energy as a player because you’ve got to think of 14 other guys with everything you do," Olshey says. "You can’t just focus on your game and your development. You’re going to have to understand that everybody is going to look to you, and that can become exhausting in terms of your own personal resources."

Lillard, Olshey said, did not flinch in accepting the role, and when Nurkic arrived in the middle of a 2017 season that appeared destined to end in the draft lottery, Lillard was ready for the onboarding process.

In the wake of LaMarcus Aldridge’s departure in 2015, Damian Lillard has become the voice of the Blazers, not only to fans and media but also to his teammates.

"Part of what makes Dame special is he doesn’t punish the son for the sins of the father," Olshey says. "There’s no revisionist history. If we make a decision to move on from a player and bring somebody new on, Dame knows it’s his job to integrate him into the culture, embrace them and give them the best chance to succeed. That was very empowering for Nurk because when he joined our team, we had slipped out of the playoff race. The season was going downhill really fast. It looked like we were going to miss the playoffs for the first time in four years. Dame realized that Nurk was the linchpin to turning the season around, so he jumped on it right away."

Lillard had already been eyeing Nurkic from afar. He’s known Shaw for a while through their mutual Oakland connection and tuned into Denver’s games whenever he could.

Nurkic’s body language stood out to Lillard.

"I would see him get frustrated," Lillard says. "They would always talk about him on the broadcast, how big his dad was and all that stuff. He stuck out like a sore thumb because he was a big dude, powerful. When he came to us, he was kind of hard. He was happy to be there, but he was still hard, like he didn’t want to really mess with nobody that much."

Lillard made sure that Nurkic knew he was welcomed and held to the same standards as everyone on the roster.

"That’s where I kind of struggled the year in Denver," Nurkic says. "[In Portland] I came to enjoy the basketball. It’s just kind of fun out there. Just two great guards who make my life easier, just kind of on the fly. We understand each other. Even if we don’t talk, we understand what we’re supposed to do on the court."

Fellow Portland center Meyers Leonard likens Nurkic’s game to a rival big man who plays farther down the coast.

"If you watch the Warriors in particular, when Draymond [Green] catches the ball in the post, he’s not even really looking to score," Leonard says. "He’s waiting for a cutting player or a cutting KD or somebody to go into a gaggle action, or a flare screen, and all of a sudden, two defenders make a mistake and there’s a backdoor cut. Nurk has that vision. … Then having a shooting touch … when he’s locked in and when he’s playing to his fullest capability, he’s impressive to watch."

And it made a difference in Portland soon after he arrived.

The Blazers ended the 2016-17 season 17-6. In an overtime win over Philadelphia, Nurkic became the first player to have at least 28 points, 20 rebounds, eight assists and six blocks in more than 30 years. "Portland fans fell in love with him," Leonard says. Just as Nurk Fever overtook Portland, however, Nurkic suffered a fracture in his right leg. He returned for a cameo during Golden State’s sweep over Portland in the playoffs.

With Nurkic playing about 26 minutes per game, the Trail Blazers rank third in the league in rebound percentage and 10th in opponent points allowed in the paint, according to NBA.com.

Still, a home had been found. Nurkic enjoyed the passion of the city’s fans and that he could find a coffee shop seemingly on every corner. It reminded him of home. (Nurkic estimates he began drinking coffee with his mother at around five.)

Damn, that’s a good life out here, Nurkic recalls thinking.

The honeymoon is over. Work toward a lasting partnership is progressing. The organization asked Nurkic to drop some weight over the summer of 2017, so he stopped eating sugar and took up boxing classes, CrossFit and bike riding.

Nurkic shed more than 30 pounds. He posted career highs in points (14.3), rebounds (9.0) and blocks (1.4) while playing in 79 games in his first full season with the Blazers. Portland’s defensive rating jumped from 22nd (110.0) to sixth (105.5). At times, Nurkic still struggled with inconsistent play.

"I was too fast, I guess," Nurkic says. "I would do stuff in a rush. I would do stuff like, I didn’t recognize myself either."

Nurkic describes this past summer as a whirlwind after getting swept out of the first round last spring. Speculation swirled about whether these Trail Blazers had peaked and if the Lillard/McCollum backcourt should be dissolved. The organization optioned for stability and Nurkic signed his contract extension.

"You’re talking about a guy who had one foot out of the league, to the point where Denver gave us a first-round pick to take him to a certain degree," Olshey says. "He was a guy that everybody knew was talented, but there were issues as far as would he make it or not; could he control his emotions, did he have the maturity, was he professional enough? Dame guided him through the end of that rookie scale contract. And then when he got paid last summer, Dame had another talk with him about, ‘It’s going to be different now. You have a contract. Eyes are going to be on you. People are going to expect you to live up to and earn that contract.’"

Nurkic knows. "This is kind of the place I want to be and where I’m going to be hopefully the next three to four years," Nurkic says. "The next step was, ‘I want to be an All-Star and I want to win as many games as we can.’"

So far, the results have been mixed.

A brief ride to the top of the Western Conference standings has leveled off of late for the Blazers. For his part, Nurkic has been the same, efficient low-post presence he’s been since arriving in Portland, averaging 15.0 points per game on 51.6 percent shooting and 10.6 rebounds.

"He’s taking his time a little bit more when he gets the ball, either on rolls or offensive rebounds or post-ups," says Blazers coach Terry Stotts. "I think he’s doing a better job of finishing around the basket. Defensively, he’s had an impact ever since he’s been here, so I don’t notice as big a difference on the defensive end, but it just seems like he’s a little bit more under control at the offensive end."

Lillard has noticed the changes.

"Now … that he’s been with our team, [he has an] understanding of what we need him to do and what we want him to do to improve, and he’s committed to it," Lillard says. "It’s one thing for him to have all those things that he’s capable of and [it’s] … another thing for him to be committed to it and to do it all the time, and I think that’s the biggest difference for us."

Indeed, Lillard won’t let him forget. The two have become close in their season-and-a-half together. They text. They FaceTime. They discuss games and game situations and more.

"We’re always around each other, always in each other’s ear. Before practice we sit there and talk. After practice we sit there and talk. We went to dinner in Orlando and just talked about our girlfriends, you know.

"I think it’s gone past the teammate group; that’s my brother now. I just want somebody to think they need to remake the movie with Gheorghe Muresan, My Giant, and have me and Nurk in there. I told him we should do that next year for Halloween."

Jonathan Abrams is a senior writer for B/R Mag. A former staff writer at Grantland and sports reporter at theNew York Timesand theLos Angeles Times, Abrams is also the best-selling author ofAll the Pieces Matter: The Inside Story of The Wire—available right here, right now. Follow him on Twitter: @jpdabrams.

Source Article


Visit to Learn More: http://www.correfarmaceutico.com/portlands-odd-couple-knows-exactly-what-it-wants/

Monday 3 December 2018

New Shelter For Portland Homeless Families Emerges From Donation

PORTLAND, OR – There’s a new place for 75 children and their parents to seek shelter from the winter weather. The shelter at 1150 Northwest 17th Avenue opened for business on Dec 3.

The shelter is in a building donated by developer Tom Cody and is being operated by Portland Homeless Family Services. The shelter was created by them along with the City of Portland and Multnomah County’s Joint Office of Homeless Services.

"I am optimistic that by working together, the business community and the public sector can continue to make meaningful progress in addressing homelessness," Cody said.

"With many contributing, outcomes can be immediate and impactful. I hope we can continue to build on these kinds of partnerships."

Get all the latest information on what’s happening in your community by signing up for Patch’s newsletters and breaking news alerts

The location is new for the shelter, which was previously located blocks away at Congregation Beth Israel.

The congregation will continue helping the shelter by providing volunteer and community connections.

It will be open every night from 6 p.m. through 8 a.m. through April 30, 2019.

The shelter is expected to bring a big lift of assistance for homeless families in the area. Currently there are more than 100 families on the wait lists for shelter who are currently sleeping in their cars or on the streets.

"These are kids who don’t have anywhere to do their homework, brush their teeth, or read bedtime stories," the executive director of Portland Homeless Family Solutions, Brandi Tuck said.

"Thanks to this unique collaboration Portland Homeless Family Solutions is able to provide 75 kids and parents a place to sleep and get back on their feet this winter. We will work with families to help them move back into housing."

Families will be able to apply for space at the shelter by calling 211.

If space is available, they will be given an interview.

Families that make it in to the shelter will be able to stay there as many days as they need and will receive a hot dinner and breakfast.

Portland Family Homeless Services will also operate a day center nearby at SW 13th Avenue and Salmon Street in partnership with the First Unitarian Church. Families can take showers there as well as do laundry and hang out.

Photo via Portland Homeless Family Services.

Source Article


Visit to Learn More: http://www.correfarmaceutico.com/new-shelter-for-portland-homeless-families-emerges-from-donation/

Tuesday 20 November 2018

City Council approves changes to short-term rental rules

not everyone thinks the current policy needs updating.

The Portland City Council on Monday night approved new short-term rental rules aimed at slowing the trend of renting private homes and apartments through services like Airbnb.

Councilors passed rules that will allow property owners to register only one short-term rental per year. Councilors also increased the cap on non-owner occupied short-term rental units to 400 from the present 300 units.

Mayor Ethan Strimling said the vote was disappointing and would hurt affordable housing in the city.

“This body will be back looking at short-term rentals in a few years because we didn’t get it right,” he said.

But Councilor Justin Costa said focusing on short-term rentals ignored many other reasons Portland has an affordable housing problem.

“The more we take out one tiny piece and try to focus on that and make that the stand-in for the issue of housing affordability, that does not do justice to the issue here,” Costa said.

“Pitting neighbor against neighbor is not going to help us solve this problem and it is not going to make anyone’s lives any better.”

Presently, the ordinance allows apartment building owners to rent units they don’t live in short term, as long as they live in the building. As a consequence, there are actually 315 units rented in non-owner occupied apartments and houses.

Another 31 units in owner-occupied buildings are on a city waiting list, making a total of 346 rental units not in a primary residence.

Some are concerned that if the trend continues, it will have a serious effect on the city’s long-term housing stock and worsen Portland’s affordability problem.

“I don’t want any building to be completely dominated by short-term rentals,” District 1 Councilor Belinda Ray said.

The practice of renting a private room, home or apartment for a night or two has become a popular alternative to hotels, spread through online services like Airbnb.

Supporters of short-term rentals say it supports local economies and helps homeowners pay for taxes and improvements.

Critics, however, contend that short-term rentals are taking needed housing for full-time residents off the market, pushing rents up and eroding neighborhood character.

The updated ordinance clarifies that after the new rules take effect on Dec. 1 only homes or apartments that are a primary residence can be registered as owner-occupied. The non-owner occupied units that are registered, even those that exceed the cap, can be re-registered for the next year.

Several property owners who spoke at the meeting Monday said they made improvements to their multi-unit buildings they live in with the expectation they could rent them short-term. They were dismayed to learn the rules were changing and were not allowed to register a short-term rental in their building.

Thibodeau, the District 2 councilor, said the rules work and do not need a wholesale rewrite. He also doesn’t think there is evidence short-term rentals are eroding the city’s affordable housing stock.

“In short, I don’t think we should pin the affordability crisis on the shared economy,” he said.

Airbnb also believes the city’s new rules go too far.

“Simply put, we believe that there is clear value in continuing to foster STR activity among non-primary residences and that there is no evidence suggesting that short-term rental activity is a primary driver of rent increases in the city of Portland,” said Josh Meltzer, chief of Northeast public policy for the online company.

Instead, Airbnb advocates a tiered approach that would distinguish between and have progressive regulatory schemes for occasional hosts, regular hosts for primary residences and non-primary home hosts.

While it supports grandfathering existing registered units above the cap “we encourage the council to recognize the benefits of allowing new hosts to also list secondary homes going forward,” Meltzer said.

But some neighborhood activists don’t believe the council’s new rules go far enough.

Last week, a group called Munjoy Hill Conservation Collaborative sent councilors a petition with 35 signatures demanding a one-person, one-listing system only for primary residences or a tenant who has landlord approval – similar to the rules passed by South Portland voters on Nov. 6.

Karen Snyder, a member of the collaborative who lives on Waterville Street, is disappointed the city is honoring registered non-owner occupied units that now exceed the limit.

She’s also worried people will find new loopholes in the city’s ordinance and keep registering new non owner-occupied units.

“Ultimately, I think it is a step in the right direction, but if you actually review the ordinance right now, it is really wordy and sometimes not really clear,” Snyder said.

“Creating a new one from scratch would be better,” she added. “You are just trying to fix a broken policy, putting a band-aid on it.”

Peter McGuire can be contacted at 791-6325 or at:

pmcguire@pressherald.com

Twitter: @PeteL_McGuire

Source Article


Visit to Learn More: http://www.correfarmaceutico.com/city-council-approves-changes-to-short-term-rental-rules/

Wednesday 7 November 2018

Five takeaways from the Lakers’ 114-110 win over the Portland Trail Blazers

Lakers forward LeBron James (23) and center JaVale McGee, right, block a shot from Portland Trail Blazers center Jusuf Nurkic (27) during the first half of a game on Saturday. (Craig Mitchelldyer / Associated Press)

These two games felt like scheduled losses for the Lakers. After a drama-filled week with news of a tense interaction between Luke Walton and Magic Johnson, the Lakers had Portland on the road and then were to return home to play the east-leading Toronto Raptors the next day.

Instead, the Lakers notched their first win in Portland since the 2013-14 season and are 2-0 since that much-talked-about meeting Tuesday.

1. Rajon Rondo was tremendous on the court of the Lakers and had an amusing interaction with a fan at the end of the game. Walton said he orchestrated a “beautiful game.” His play was a major part of why the Lakers won that game.

Then in the game’s closing seconds, as Portland fans began to leave in frustration, Rondo looked engaged in conversation with a woman sitting courtside.

“She said she loved my shoes and I was telling her I loved hers,” Rondo said after the game. He was told she waved goodbye. “Did she or [did she] shoot me the finger?” Rondo asked. “Which one?”

She actually made a hand motion indicating he was talking too much. “Oh she did that,” Rondo said. “Oh, [you can] tell her favorite character on ‘Muppet Babies’ was… who’s the guy who did this [moves his fingers like it’s a mouth]? Kermit?”

Lakers

2. JaVale McGee is about to get some help, but he’s shown his value to the Lakers so far. McGee had six blocks Saturday night and was critical for the Lakers defensively.

Their plan was to force Portland’s shooters inside and that plan depended on McGee being able to make them pay once they got there.

“I just try to be in the right places at the right time,” said McGee, who leads the NBA in blocks. “I got beat to the rim a couple times, but I was just really trying to focus on not letting that happen.”

3. Ivica Zubac got his first extended playing time all season. He’d only played seven minutes all season before this and not at all in the previous four games.

“Their second unit has been killing games. They had 50 [points] last game, I think, as a group,” Lakers coach Luke Walton said. “And they’ve been playing that bigger lineup out there. And Zu, like I said, he’s been working hard and he’s looked good the last couple days. So we told him before that there’s a good chance he gets his number called so be ready.”

4. Walton joked with Josh Hart that it was nice to have him back. Of course, Hart didn’t go anywhere, but his play had slipped a bit over the past few games. Hart laughed when he was asked about Walton saying that. Then he was asked if moving to the bench affected him.

Lakers

“It’s a little different because I’m coming off the bench at the four,” Hart said. “So it’s different from a backup shooting guard to starting shooting guard to backup power forward. So the road’s a little different, but I have the opportunity, I showed them what I could do. And now it’s just helping this team win, and that’s whatever role I’m given and do that to the best of my ability.”

Hart took only three shots and made them all. Two of them were critical three-pointers. He also had an assist, a steal and two blocks. His impact extended far beyond

5. The Lakers defensive effort was better Saturday night than it has been all season. In speaking with players in the locker room, they felt that what changed was that the team sustained its effort.

Source Article


Visit to Learn More: http://www.correfarmaceutico.com/five-takeaways-from-the-lakers-114-110-win-over-the-portland-trail-blazers/

Friday 26 October 2018

Portland Business Owners Say They Ended Up On Campaign Material They Didn’t Actually Support

Eva Liu doesn’t support the Portland gross receipts tax measure on the ballot this November.

That’s according to the Multnomah County Voter’s Pamphlet, at least, which includes about a quarter of a page of arguments “furnished by Eva Lui” in opposition to the measure. Her corner of the pamphlet implores voters to vote “no” on Measure 26-201, the ballot initiative that would impose a one percent tax on the gross revenue large retailers generate in Portland in order to create a clean energy fund.

But Liu doesn’t actually oppose the measure, which she says she supports because of rising utility bills at her Northeast Portland restaurant of 18 years. Proponents of the measure, which would use money generated from the tax to fund clean energy projects and jobs around the city, notified Liu of her presence on the voter’s pamphlet. Her photo also appeared on the “No On 26-201” website.

“I didn’t know my name was on there,” Liu told OPB. “They even had the last name wrong.”

Proponents of the measure filed a formal election complaint with the Secretary of State’s office asking for an investigation into how two business owners appeared on campaign material they didn’t actually support. They say Liu and another business owner were misled by the Keep Portland Affordable PAC — the group opposing the gross receipts tax — into falsely supporting the opposition campaign.

“I didn’t realize that I was signing on to oppose the Portland Clean Energy Initiative,” Liu wrote in a letter to the Keep Portland Affordable PAC Tuesday.

The complaint alleges the PAC intentionally misled at least two small business owners — both immigrants whose second language is English — into signing documents they believed endorsed another measure. The group says the two owners were led to believe they were being asked to support measure 103, which would prohibit taxes on groceries.

Documents included in the complaint show Liu and Hari Lal, who run King’s Omelets and Spice Kitchen respectively, both signed papers with quotations later attributed to them on Keep Portland Affordable campaign material. Both owners’ photos appeared on the Keep Portland Affordable website. Liu was quoted in a paid political advertisement in the Oregonian/OregonLive. She also appears in the opposition section of Measure 26-201 on the county voter pamphlet.

Both business owners have since expressed their support for the gross receipts tax measure. Keep Portland Affordable PAC has removed their photos from its website.

A screenshot of Hari Lal, owner of Spice Kitchen, on the Keep Portland Affordable PAC website.

“It was made very clear what the measure is and what support was being requested,” Keep Portland Affordable PAC said in an emailed statement. “If Ms. Liu, or other supporters, change their positions on the measure, we will of course abide by any of their requests.”

The ‘no’ campaign said its outreach efforts include a website sign-up, social media, or individual outreach and relationship building. Documents show Liu signed an official document for the County Elections office noting opposition for measure 26-201 on Sept. 10. She said canvassers who’d entered her restaurant did not tell her explicitly that the document was related to the gross receipts tax measure. The complaint argues that even though Liu and Lal signed legal documents, “the ‘no’ campaign made no efforts to ensure that Ms. Liu or Mr. Hal (sic) understood the legal documents they were signing.”

“They said, ‘keep Portland affordable’ – I remember those words,” Liu said, referring to canvassers who entered her restaurant this summer. “I thought I was signing for no grocery tax.”

The gross receipts tax measure would not apply to groceries, medicine or health care services, and the Keep Portland Affordable PAC said it does not collaborate with the Yes on 103 campaign. It also says it has not heard directly from Lal about the use of his image on their website. Lal signed a similar letter to the one Liu sent to the PAC, stating he did not realize he was signing documents opposing the Portland Clean Energy Initiative.

Hari Lal said he supports the gross receipts tax measure on the ballot this November.

As for the language that ended up in the voter’s pamphlet, Liu said she doesn’t recognize any of it.

“Immigrants who speak English as a second language are particularly vulnerable to manipulation and that’s what happened,” said Khanh Pham, manager of immigrant organizing at the Asian Pacific American Network of Oregon. APANO is on the steering committee for the clean energy fund measure.

Lal, meanwhile, told supporters behind the clean energy measure that he could not remember anyone taking his photo, which has since been removed from the Keep Portland Affordable website. He only remembers someone dropping off “Yes on 103” signs, literature and magnets.

Since taking down their photos, no local business owner is featured on the Keep Portland Affordable homepage.

Source Article


Visit to Learn More: http://www.correfarmaceutico.com/portland-business-owners-say-they-ended-up-on-campaign-material-they-didnt-actually-support/

Thursday 11 October 2018

Portland Moves To Clean Up Its Act (Or At Least Its Streets)

PORTLAND, OR – Portland Mayor Ted Wheeler knows that the city needs to clean up its act. On Thursday morning, he announced what he hopes will be first steps toward making that happen.

Wheeler announced that starting this week, the city will be providing trash service six days a week. Downtown Portland, meanwhile, will soon be getting an additional 200 trash containers for the streets.

The bins – 100 of which will arrive this month – are being purchased by Clean & Safe, an affiliate of the Portland Business Alliance. The group is spending $300,000 for the high-capacity bins. Get all the latest information on what’s happening in your community by signing up for Patch’s newsletters and breaking news alerts

Officials say that with Clean & Safe buying bins for downtown, it will allow the city to buy more trash receptacles for other parts of the city.

"It is critical that we put our money and efforts where our mouth is, and this additional pick up schedule is just one of the ways we are doing that," Wheeler said at a news conference to mark the 30th anniversary of the Clean & Safe District downtown.

"This is just the first announcements of several to come."

Wheeler says his goal is to make Portland the cleanest city in the United States.

Photo of Mayor Wheeler with new trash receptacles via Clean & Safe/Portland Business Alliance.

Source Article


Visit to Learn More: http://www.correfarmaceutico.com/portland-moves-to-clean-up-its-act-or-at-least-its-streets/

Friday 28 September 2018

Portland’s first price-restricted housing unit a tough sell

The Onejoy project, a 12-unit condo building under construction in Portland’s West End. A unit in the development is being set aside as affordable housing for a middle-income family.

For more than six months, Chris Lavoie has tried to sell a condominium in Portland’s West End, a desirable neighborhood with historic buildings and a short walk from award-winning restaurants, coffee shops, art galleries, breweries and shops.

At 515 square feet, the one-bedroom condo under construction at Onejoy, a 12-unit development off Brackett Street, qualifies as micro-housing – a hot trend among some buyers, particularly young professionals or empty-nesters. The price – $208,700 – is actually lower than what comparable condos have sold for in the neighborhood, even in the same building. And it’s being marketed at a time when the real estate market in Maine’s largest city appears to be firing on all cylinders.

“I can’t get traction on it,” said Lavoie, who created a separate web page for the unit.

Such is the plight of the real estate agent tasked with selling Portland’s first newly built price-restricted housing unit to result from a 2015 affordable housing ordinance.

Portland’s so-called inclusionary zoning ordinance was intended to promote the construction of housing affordable to middle-income workers. The city has seen a flood of luxury condos being built since 2015, but those developers have opted to pay the city hundreds of thousands of dollars in fees rather than put units on the market that qualified as affordable under the ordinance. That money has gone into a fund used to help finance other affordable housing projects.

Now, three years after the ordinance passed, the first unit is under construction as part of an unusual condo project aimed at less affluent buyers.

Portland’s ordinance requires 10 percent of units in projects of 10 or more units to be affordable to middle-income earners. Such programs, known as inclusionary zoning, are being used by cities across the country to preserve and produce affordable housing for the middle class.

The sale price must be affordable for a household earning 20 percent more than the area median income for Greater Portland. The income level depends on the size of the household that fits into a unit. A three-bedroom unit, for example, could be priced for a family of four earning $108,000. The price is then based on what that family can afford if it spends 30 percent of that income on rent or a mortgage.

Developer Todd Alexander, whose Renewal Housing company is doing the Onejoy condo project in Portland’s West End.

So, in the case of this small one-bedroom unit at Onejoy, the city’s target buyer is a single adult earning as much as $75,600, which results in a maximum price of $208,700.

Under the city’s rules, future resales of so-called workforce housing units also must comply with the pricing limits. A 99-year deed restriction is attached to each unit to ensure that it remains relatively affordable to future workers.

The sticking point in the effort to sell the unit at Onejoy doesn’t seem to be the unit size, finishes or price, Lavoie said.

Two other 515-square-foot units in the same building, with hardwood floors and quartz countertops, are already under contract for sales prices between $215,000 to $260,000. The so-called workforce unit has the same finishes and is listed for less money – $208,700. Lavoie said that is about half the average sales price for condos sold on the Portland peninsula in the last year.

“The only thing I can go back to is the deed restriction,” Lavoie said. “People buy the real estate to get the upside of it. If they’re realizing in the process that they’re being handicapped in selling it, they look for something else.”

Portland adopted its inclusionary zoning ordinance in late 2015. At the time, rents in Portland had risen 40 percent in the preceding five years and policymakers were looking for ways to create and preserve workforce housing for people like teachers, firefighters and young professionals.

So far, 16 approved projects have triggered the ordinance and four more are under review. But most developers have provided the city a fee rather than actually building the units. That fee is currently set at about $105,000 for every workforce unit not built. So far, developers have paid just over $976,000 into the city’s housing trust, according to city data. Some developers with projects in the pipeline have yet to decide whether to provide the housing or pay the fee.

The fact that most developers would rather pay the fee doesn’t bother Jeff Levine, the city’s urban planning and development director. Levine said the city can leverage every $100,000 payment into six or more units of housing by working with affordable housing developers such as Avesta Housing and the Portland Housing Authority. But he also said he would like to see more workforce housing like Onejoy being built.

“I expect as the market matures, more people will be building these units,” Levine said.

Some city officials have proposed strengthening the ordinance. Mayor Ethan Strimling and City Councilor Brian Batson have proposed requiring a higher percentage of workforce units in new developments. And Strimling has proposed higher fees for developers opting out of the program and lower income guidelines, which would reduce the price of the units. But the council has not moved forward with those proposals.

Cape Elizabeth has required that low- and middle-income units be included in subdivisions with more than five units since 1992. Its program also has a fee, but it’s the difference between the restricted sales price and the actual sales price, which can be much more than $100,000. Most developers end up building the units, according to Town Planner Maureen O’Meara, who said the program has created 14 affordable units.

O’Meara said the fee in some cases can be $200,000 or more. “Nobody takes that option, because it’s a really expensive fee,” she said. “The fee encourages actually constructing the affordable housing, which is what we prefer.”

Kevin Donoghue, the former Portland city councilor behind Portland’s ordinance, said the fact that developers are paying the fee instead of building the units tells him one thing.

“The ordinance could certainly be strengthened,” Donoghue said. “As most developers choose to pay the fee in lieu of building inclusive housing developments, the current fee is clearly set far too low. The fee proceeds certainly allow the city to help create new permanent homes.”

Some developers have found another way to comply with Portland’s ordinance without building workforce units or paying the fee. They provide price- or rent-restricted units off site, typically by purchasing a housing unit and attaching the price restriction.

The ordinance allows the practice as long as those units are located within 1,500 feet of the project, or within the same U.S. Census tract, or when a case can be made that it is in the same neighborhood, Levine said.

That’s how the NewHeight group met the city’s requirement to build two workforce units as part of the high-end Luminato condos on Franklin Street. They’re also using that strategy to provide one of three workforce units required in the Verdante at Lincoln Park, which was recently approved by planners.

NewHeight provided the required housing at 42 Hampshire St., a three-unit building that the company already owned nearby. The developer sold the three-unit apartment building to Community Housing of Maine for a discounted price and CHOM deed-restricted two two-bedroom units so that the 24-unit Luminato project would comply with the ordinance, said Erin Cooperrider, who holds positions at both NewHeight and CHOM. The third unit will help the nearby 30-unit Verdante project comply with the ordinance.

“It has the same impact,” Cooperrider said. “It preserves a unit at an affordable rent or affordable sales price for a period of time.”

Cooperrider said they will pay a nearly $210,000 fee to the city for the remaining two workforce units required at Verdante only if they cannot find another apartment building to buy, or find a landlord to provide the deed-restricted rentals on their behalf. “We’d like to find another small building for sale that’s on the peninsula, but nothing’s for sale,” she said.

While more developers have indicated an intent to build workforce units, only two others have actually begun construction and marketing of those units. In addition to Onejoy, the 23-unit Parris Terraces project in Bayside is building two deed-restricted workforce units.

Developer Todd Alexander, whose Renewal Housing company is doing the Onejoy project, said he decided to include the workforce unit at Onejoy because the price was not all that different from the market-rate units. He also supports the mission behind the city policy, because his company primarily does affordable rental housing development out of state, he said.

“The city is doing the right thing by having this policy,” Alexander said.

Jack Soley, the developer behind Parris Terraces in Bayside, also included deed-restricted workforce units because their sales prices are expected to be comparable to similarly sized units within the project. His two workforce units are about 500 square feet and are listed at $215,000, whereas the other 23 units are priced as high as $229,000.

Soley also has not seen much demand for his deed-restricted workforce units over the four months they have been listed, but he’s not sure the deed restriction is to blame. People are generally interested in the units on the upper floors.

“All the units on the fourth floor went within the first week of being on the market,” Soley said. “People simply want the views.”

Portland did build in an escape clause for the deed restrictions, which could help developers or future owners sell the units.

If a unit has been marketed for six months and no buyer can be found, the seller can ask the city for relief from those requirements. The city can then either purchase the unit, or it can allow the owner to sell the unit at market rate to any buyer, regardless of income. If the latter occurs, however, the owner must pay the city the proceeds between the restricted sales price and the actual sales price.

Levine said staff may ask the council to extend the marketing period, based on similar programs in other communities. “One specific change we are looking at is a longer marketing time, since we have learned that buyers of affordable units want to see a completed unit,” Levine said.

The city is also taking some steps to help developers market their workforce units. City officials are working with Avesta’s Homeownership Program to find qualified buyers, Levine said. And the city has created a website and list-serve for prospective buyers to keep them informed when units become available.

Strimling said he thinks Portland should reconsider the provision that allows people to get out of the program if they have marketed the property for six months without a buyer.

“That is definitely a loophole we need to look at,” Strimling said. “That seems like an opportunity for someone to put it on the market for six months and not put in the effort it needs and sell it for more money to get around it.”

Soley, the developer of the Parris Terraces, said he’s not sure if he will ask the city to drop the deed restriction if his units haven’t sold after two more months. “We’ll cross that bridge when we get there,” he said.

Although the unit at Onejoy has already been marketed for over six months, Alexander, the owner, said he’s going to keep trying – at least for now.

“Our intent right now is to keep the inclusionary zoning restriction in place and keep marketing it,” Alexander said. “I’m not sure we will do it forever.”

Share

Source Article


Visit to Learn More: http://www.correfarmaceutico.com/portlands-first-price-restricted-housing-unit-a-tough-sell/

Saturday 2 June 2018

Is Airbnb making housing shortages worse?

A number of cities across the country are taking steps to regulate–or outright ban–Airbnb, the online marketplace that allows people to rent out their properties or spare rooms to short-term guests. Critics argue Airbnb is displacing locals and low-income families. But defenders of Airbnb argue it helps many Americans out by giving them a way to make some extra money on the side, and gives guests more affordable options than a pricey hotel. Is Airbnb making housing shortages worse?

PERSPECTIVES

Airbnb shifts tourists from hotels to homeowners. Instead of having to go through the proper channels and regulations, some people on Airbnb list multiple apartments and houses on the website, essentially acting as hotels. These apartments are taken away from locals who need permanent housing and reduce the total number of available units in a city.

A number of cities have either outright banned, or heavily regulated, Airbnb, and now Portland is looking to follow suit. Portland Mayor Ted Wheeler is proposing new taxes on Airbnb that would go toward the city’s housing budget and fund homeownership for displaced families who have been pushed out in part because of Airbnb.

The city plans to levy a $4-a-night charge per room on companies that facilitate short-term-rental bookings… His office projects those new taxes could provide between $1.2 million and $2.5 million toward the city’s housing budget.
"Short-term rentals take apartments off the market for people who live here–it’s only fair that companies like HomeAway and Airbnb offset their impact by helping us replace the affordable homes Portland is losing to this industry," says City Commissioner Nick Fish, who is sponsoring the tax with Wheeler. "We look forward to a conversation about the best use of those funds."

Portland Mayor Proposes a $1.2 Million Tax on Airbnb and Its Competitors to Fund Home Ownership for Displaced Families

But Airbnb argues it has a positive economic impact on cities by allowing hosts to make some extra money and helping guests save money on a pricey hotel. People sometimes have extra rooms in their houses and apartments, and Airbnb provides middle-class Americans with a tool to make more money and supplement their income.

The housing crisis is real, but it existed long before Airbnb came onto the scene. As Emily Hong argues in Quartz, San Francisco’s housing crisis exists due to failed housing policies, not the existence of Airbnb. In fact, Airbnb has actually helped a number of low-income families by allowing them to turn their couch or spare bedroom into a new source of income.

Hosting on Airbnb may actually help people to stay in their homes, by giving them the opportunity to turn a spare bedroom or couch into a new source of income. This is, in fact, the Airbnb origin story. The company was founded in 2008 when two guys started subletting their living room in order to help make rent.
There are no easy fixes for the housing imbroglio of San Francisco. But the tech industry, city government and longstanding San Francisco communities all need to move beyond adversarial relationships to make progress on a long-term, sustainable planning strategy. After all, the people of San Francisco include tech workers and yuppies as well as working-class residents, immigrant communities, middle-class families and senior citizens–and, yes, even people who use Airbnb.

The Tylt is focused on debates and conversations around news, current events and pop culture. We provide our community with the opportunity to share their opinions and vote on topics that matter most to them. We actively engage the community and present meaningful data on the debates and conversations as they progress. The Tylt is a place where your opinion counts, literally. The Tylt is an Advance Digital, Inc. property. Join us on Twitter @TheTylt or on Facebook, we’d love to hear what you have to say.

Source Article


Visit to Learn More: http://www.correfarmaceutico.com/is-airbnb-making-housing-shortages-worse/

Sunday 20 May 2018

It’s time to end Portland’s new zoning charade: Guest opinion

Skinny houses on an unimproved street in Hazelwood reflect growing population pressure in East Portland neighborhoods that originally were populated with ranch-style houses on suburban-sized lots. (Fred Leeson/2007)

By Jim Gorter, Michael Molinaro and Leslie Hammond

The yellow flier concerning zoning changes and the Residential Infill Project that appeared in the mailboxes of most residents of Portland’s single family neighborhoods is alarming. It is a reminder that the objections of 27 of 31 neighborhood associations have been ignored.

Those neighborhood groups, among others, took the time to coordinate, discuss and provide thoughtful written testimony in December 2016, opposing the density sprawl policies presented to Portland City Council. Despite cautionary amendments from council members, now with Mayor Ted Wheeler at the helm, they’ve now doubled down on the worst ideas.

The areas to be "overlayed" with "housing opportunities" have been expanded. Now, three "innovative" dwelling units would be allowed on every lot in the R5 and R7 zone where the "overlay" is applied.

What are these "innovative housing types" that advocates say we so desperately need? Along the way this rolling stone accumulated the "missing middle" a term that appeared just in time to add a lot of green to the marketing frizz. To be fair, zoning for the "missing middle" is already in place in many areas of the city. For its part, the market has shown little interest in small duplex and tri-plex units — instead favoring single family houses that surveys show are what most owners and renters prefer. And thus, what most developers find profitable.

The core proposal (aka HOOZ or the Housing Opportunity Overlay Zone) blankets much of the city with a rewrite of the single dwelling zoning code that is incongruous with the purpose of the zone. At heart, it promotes a vision of urban renewal that entitles developers to build multi-dwelling units posing as single family houses. One result is already in evidence. The more affordable single family housing stock in a given neighborhood is being demolished in favor of much more expensive replacements. It’s well known that new construction is much more expensive even when it "shares a lot" and when it’s comparable in size to what was demolished.

The populist impetus for the elimination of single dwelling zoning in much of Portland is energized by the cost of housing compared to wage growth and a collateral erosion of the social safety-net including federal spending for housing, rent subsidies and mental health. Tapping into the angst, an unholy alliance of profit-minded developers and ideological bias from 1000 Friends of Oregon has been driving this project for more than three years. It is wrapped and re-wrapped in a shifting sand of unsubstantiated claims that the infill project will lift the city to an affordable, prosperous and sustainable future.

At least for those able to sustain the redevelopment.

To date, the project is notable for its lack of thoughtful analysis of the impacts. The advocates, developers and planners supporting this highly divisive strategy, have failed to consider demolition, displacement, sprawling densification, transportation, social destabilization, loss of character and green space among other considerations. City officials point to their economic study that, upon close scrutiny, concludes that the policies will produce relatively little in the way of additional housing units.

If the past 50 years are a guide, the demolition and displacement in areas of the city with modest affordable housing will bear the brunt — just as occurred in the Albina neighborhood or the tracts redeveloped with the infamous "skinny house." Portland for Everyone (aka 1000 Friends) counters that selfish, elitist, privileged single family homeowners and renters "need to share the land." Investors and developers agree.

Along the way, the Residential Infill Project fails to consider history, economics, distinctive neighborhood context and goals for supporting walkable centers. Did we say parking? The planners fail to acknowledge that without the infill project, the city has almost double the amount of land zoned for housing that is needed for the next 20 years! The core proposal code rewrite and its accompanying zoning map comprise a fundamentally flawed and ultimately destructive vision for Portland. These provisions are not derived from the spirit or policies of the 2035 Comprehensive Plan. It is time to end the charade.

— Jim Gorter of Southwest Portland, Jack Bookwalter of Northeast Portland and Leslie Hammond of Southwest Portland. Other contributors include Michael Molinaro, AIA, of Southeast Portland, Robin Harman of Southwest Portland and Sarah Cantine, AIA, of Northeast Portland.

Source Article


Visit to Learn More: http://www.correfarmaceutico.com/its-time-to-end-portlands-new-zoning-charade-guest-opinion/

Monday 7 May 2018

Bayside at rock bottom: Portland neighborhood is under siege

Rough-looking crowds gather on street corners. Alcoholics drink openly on public sidewalks and addicts slide needles into their arms and legs. Others in drug-induced stupors slump over in doorways and entryways. Some slip into alleyways and private driveways to relieve themselves or engage in sexual acts. And tempers flare, leading to arguments and fights on city streets.

It’s springtime in Portland’s Bayside neighborhood. As the leaves and grass begin to grow, so too will the throngs of desperate, vulnerable people drawn to this area just two blocks from City Hall by the city’s overnight shelter on Oxford Street and an array of services just two blocks away at Preble Street.

After decades of coexisting with this population and the service providers who try to help them, many Bayside residents say they’ve had enough. They’re pressuring the city to do something, and they’re raising questions about the activities and impact of Preble Street, which serves about 400 people a day at its resource center.

In response to that pressure and mounting interest from real estate developers seeking to invest in the neighborhood, the city is planning to revamp and relocate its homeless shelter from Oxford Street to another part of Portland – an effort that could take years to come to fruition, if it does at all.

And Preble Street, one of the city’s most venerable and influential social services agencies, stands at a crossroads. It faces decisions about whether to follow the shelter and whether to change the way it serves the needy people who flock to its services in ever-growing numbers.

“I don’t know what’s going to be in the future for Preble Street,” Executive Director Mark Swann said, noting the agency’s unpredictable evolution. “But I am concerned, for sure, about the state of the human service system, or a lack thereof.”

Preble Street began more than 40 years ago, as a little experiment conducted by a gravel-voiced, heart-on-his-sleeve college professor from New York looking to give his students hands-on experience navigating a shrinking, yet increasingly complex, maze of social services for a growing number of vulnerable people in Maine’s largest city.

But in the last 15 years, the nonprofit has grown from having a $1.5 million budget, a handful of programs and a few dozen employees to a $12 million agency, over a dozen programs serving more than 5,000 people a year, and more than 200 part- and full-time employees, according to a Maine Sunday Telegram analysis of tax documents filed with the Internal Revenue Service.

Preble Street now sits among the top 2 percent of Maine nonprofits in terms of spending. And the rapidly evolving Portland nonprofit provides services well beyond Portland’s borders.

‘NOW I FEEL VIOLATED’

Homelessness and the predatory behavior it attracts, such as drug dealing and human trafficking, is approaching a breaking point in Bayside. Street behavior is becoming increasingly aggressive, erratic and defiant, according to the city’s shelter director and accounts from more than a dozen residents.

A man who declined to speak with the photographer teeters unsteadily on his feet in the middle of the street near Oxford Street Shelter. The pose is often associated with users of “spice” – a synthetic drug that resembles marijuana but smells like burning plastic when smoked.

Staff photo by Ben McCanna

Although they sympathize with those in need, neighborhood residents are increasingly unnerved by people on “spice,” a potent and addictive form of synthetic marijuana, whose chemical composition is constantly changing, making it dangerous and virtually impossible to outlaw.

Residents say that, during the summer months, the streets between Preble Street and the Oxford Street Shelter can become impassable because large groups of unruly people clog the roads and gather on the sidewalks.

Gone are the days when staff could leverage an overnight mat to get someone to stop drinking in public, said Rob Parritt, director of the city’s Oxford Street Shelter. There’s been a shift toward people on harder drugs who don’t care about staying at the shelter. And it’s not unusual, he said, for people to be discharged to the shelter from jails or hospitals.

“I used to know every guest that stayed with us on a first-name basis,” Parritt said. “We’re just seeing a lot of folks we don’t know.”

‘The influx of active drug addicts/alcoholics and their inappropriate behavior have made it very difficult to do business and live in Bayside. Every year is getting more out of control and I fear the worst.’

— Dennis Ferrante, resident/business owner

Sarah Michniewicz, president of the Bayside Neighborhood Association, said she had a breakdown last summer. She has lived on Cedar Street near the city shelter for 20 years and, until a few years ago, never felt threatened. Now she’s concerned not only about the quality of life in her neighborhood but also about the self-harming behavior she regularly sees.

“It used to feel like it was a coexistence, but now I feel violated,” she said. “I can’t walk into my backyard without wondering what I will find.”

To drive home the impacts of what occurs in the neighborhood every day, Michniewicz compiled testimonials from 10 Bayside residents for a report she gave city councilors when they toured the area last fall.

The report contains graphic images captured by cellphones and home surveillance cameras.

“They are ugly and some are shocking,” she wrote about her own series of photos. “Bear in mind that none of us get such a warning before encountering them in real life.”

Bayside resident Sarah Michniewicz secures her Cedar Street home with cameras and motion-activated lights. Michniewicz’s property has been the site of public fornication and drug use. “It used to feel like it was a coexistence, but now I feel violated,” she said.

There’s a photo of a young man, just below her kitchen window, plunging a needle into his heavily tattooed forearm in broad daylight. Another of a young man who followed her to her door. She later discovered he had a criminal history for burglary.

A particularly graphic daytime photo shows a man and woman having sex, braced against the side of a parked pickup truck. Michniewicz said they just smiled at the neighbor who tried to shoo them away.

There are other daytime photos from other residents of people defecating on public and private property. Suspected daytime drug deals on highly visible street corners. People laid-out on sidewalks and entryways. And needles dotting the perimeters of people’s homes.

On a recent morning, James Osbourn arrived at a vacant house on Cedar Street with a paper bowl full of Froot Loops and milk, eating them with a plastic spoon. Already waiting for him was a man calling himself “Trick,” who planned to trade his cellphone for heroin so the pair could get high in a nearby basement – a hot spot where the lock has been broken by other addicts.

“Trick,” left, and friend James Osbourn check a syringe full of heroin in the laundry room of a Cedar Street apartment building. The room is a hot spot for heroin users, many of whom do not live in the building.

Osbourn described the immediate area around the Preble Street Resource Center and the city’s Oxford Street Shelter as a safe zone for drug users.

“You can get high down here without anyone giving you a hard time,” he said.

Minutes later, the 47-year-old Trick scored a quarter-gram in an open-air deal outside the resource center’s soup kitchen, where a busy dealer made two similar transactions in rapid succession.

“This is the only neighborhood that we have – that we’re welcome in,” Trick said. “Can you imagine if we tried this on the other side – in the Old Port?”

Last summer, a longtime business, Maria’s Ristorante, whose parking lot is across from the Resource Center, announced it was leaving its location of over 40 years, citing the rise of indecent conduct near the resource center. For now, the restaurant remains open at its Cumberland Avenue location. Its owners declined repeated requests for an interview.

And city officials held a forum with downtown business owners and residents last August after the owner of Sisters Gourmet Deli in Monument Square posted a surveillance video of a disturbed man screaming obscenities at her employees.

PREDATORY BEHAVIOR

Issues in Bayside are like those in other urban communities that struggle to address the root causes of homelessness: broken mental health systems; high health care costs; an opioid epidemic with few treatment options and fewer options to pay; a lack of affordable, work-force and supportive housing; and low and stagnant wages that are not keeping pace with the cost of living.

All while the social safety net is being deliberately unwoven.

City Councilor Belinda Ray, who represents Bayside, sympathizes with residents. She says they are understandably frustrated by a lack of progress on the larger societal issues that are producing the obscene scenes compiled by Michniewicz.

Social services were intentionally clustered in Bayside with the best intentions, she said.

The plan was to weave together a tight network of low-barrier services for people in need, giving them access to soup kitchens, the Preble Street Resource Center and the city’s overnight emergency shelter without having to fill out a lot of paperwork, show identification, agree to work on a housing plan or be sober. It’s intended to be an entry point for an array of social services – one based on relationships and trust, which can begin simply by giving someone a new pair of socks.

But important services to treat mental illness and substance abuse, coupled with a lack of low-income housing, are becoming increasingly rare, forcing many to remain in limbo at Preble Street awaiting help that may never arrive.

“People are asking for help and we have nothing for them – that’s what’s so sad about this work,” Swann said. “So they continue on the street. They stay in the shelters. They don’t get the help they need.”

Ray said the crowd of desperate, damaged people has created a large pool of potential victims for predators.

“The vulnerable population isn’t the problem,” said Ray, who continues to support a low-barrier system. “It’s what springs out of that. We often get predatory behaviors around vulnerable populations. So you have people who are human traffickers and drug traffickers who are trying to get those checks that come out at the beginning of the month from people.”

Ironically, the increasingly hostile environment that has grown up around the cluster of low-barrier services is becoming a barrier for others in need.

Katie Farr said she and her wife, Trish, who is from Portland, ended up at Preble Street last summer after becoming unemployed and without a place to live. The 36-year-old Navy veteran said she’s traveled around the world and has never seen – or experienced – anything like the summertime crowds gathered outside of Preble Street.

Farr said some of those people encouraged her to prostitute herself, rather than panhandling, to make money. Others were openly using drugs on the sidewalks. Instead of prostitution, Farr and her wife joined the city’s Portland Opportunity Crew, which offers work to panhandlers. And they got regular jobs and an apartment in Biddeford.

“I was in the Navy. I’ve been all over the world. I’ve been in more countries than states. But I think coming down here was the biggest culture shock of my life, compared to anywhere,” Farr said. “I pretty much cried for the whole first week we were here and didn’t talk to anybody.”

‘A LITTLE EXPERIMENT’

Three years after moving from New York to Portland in 1972, Joseph Kreisler planted the seed for the agency that would become Preble Street.

From an early age until he died in 2002 at the age of 82, Kreisler was an activist. At 14, he picketed outside his father’s soda factory in Yonkers, holding a sign reading “My Father Unfair to Organized Labor” over a $1.75 debt he felt he was owed.

After becoming the head of the University of Southern Maine’s social work program, Kreisler opened a low-barrier resource center at 68 High St., which he once called “a little experiment.”

Initially funded through a $1,500 grant, the center exposed about 20 students to the challenges of social work and had no paid staff.

Training students continues to be a part of the group’s mission, but under Swann’s leadership, Preble Street’s presence – both in Bayside and statewide – has grown significantly. Much of that growth has been a reaction to the loss of other shelters and community services, as funding for a social safety net has dried up.

A crowd gathers at the intersection of Preble and Oxford streets where two men are fighting in the street adjacent to Preble Street Resource Center.

Today, the resource center, which in 2015 had a $1.4 million budget and saw about 400 people a day, employs about a dozen caseworkers, each of whom is responsible for working with about 28 people on housing and self-improvement plans.

But staff must also maintain order at the center, which is a social setting for people otherwise shunned from the business district. It’s become a place where the outcast and downtrodden can play a game of cards, roll a pile of cigarettes using bulk tobacco or maybe just read a book. Some simply wait for help in the form of housing and other services that may never arrive.

“The changes over the last 25 years have just put more and more pressure on that building – far beyond our wildest imaginations,” Swann said. “We were not founded as a shelter, or a homeless organization or a soup kitchen.”

TENT CITY AT CITY HALL PLAZA

One of Preble Street’s first political actions occurred in 1987, when it joined a coalition protesting the lack of emergency shelter in Portland. About 100 people, including many homeless, set up a “Tent City” encampment at City Hall plaza and later at Lincoln Park, with a goal of getting the city to provide low-barrier shelter and services for anyone in need.

Despite concerns that Portland would become a regional magnet for homelessness, then-City Manager Robert Ganley agreed to the group’s demands after two weeks.

“He really established a norm and a policy and a value to this community right then that we think is still the right thing to do and as far as we’re concerned it’s still a policy of the city,” Swann said in a video celebrating Preble Street’s 40th anniversary.

The city eventually created the Oxford Street Shelter. Originally a 20-bed, low-barrier facility, it has been expanded to accommodate 154 people on thin mats only inches from each other. The city also runs a family shelter on Chestnut Street.

In recent years, at least two-thirds of the people seeking emergency shelter at both facilities have come from other Maine communities, out of state and out of country. The shelters regularly exceed capacity, forcing officials to find overflow space at Preble Street, the Salvation Army gym and in some cases the city’s own General Assistance office.

Tom Blackburn, who has lived on Hanover Street for 20 years and served on a task force on homelessness in 2011, has advocated for Preble Street to tighten up its low-barrier policies.

“Portland is a very compassionate city and wanted to take care of these folks,” the 69-year-old Blackburn said. “Unfortunately, what happened was that became an open invitation.”

Oxford Street Shelter director Rob Parritt poses for a portrait within the shelter’s second-floor women’s dorm. The shelter has seen an increase in people using harder drugs and an increase in homelessness. “I used to know every guest that stayed with us on a first name basis,” Parritt said. “We’re just seeing a lot of folks we don’t know.”

Ron Spinella, 68, who has lived in Bayside for more than 20 years, believes that Preble Street makes it easier for other communities to avoid taking care of their own residents.

Swann said many urban communities believe they’re magnets for homeless people from other communities, but poor people migrate to where they have the best chance to survive.

“It is an absolute prevalent notion across the country that our city is somehow taking on the poorest of the poor from everywhere,” he said.

RIGORS OF THE OPIOID CRISIS

The pressing needs at the resource center are overwhelming Preble Street staff. In some ways, they have become first responders in the ongoing opioid epidemic, which first presented itself at the center four years ago.

In 2017, staff responded to an overdose once every eight days and saved 40 lives, Swann said in testimony prepared for a statewide bill to address opioid use among homeless populations.

“For four decades Preble Street has trained social workers in building relationships, in helping people find housing, and jobs, and reunite with their families,” he wrote. “Now the very first thing we train social workers to do is reverse an opioid overdose. Every staffer carries naloxone and is trained in how to administer it.”

Staff have now developed formal procedures for responding to overdoses, including maintaining calm in a crowded room of people who are easily triggered into crisis.

Motion-detector lights were installed in restrooms, and the bottoms of bathroom doors were removed – all so staff could more quickly detect and respond to overdoses.

Since last summer, the center began closing early on Wednesdays so staff can decompress, train and work through the stresses of the job, according to Casework Services Supervisor Mary Beth Sullivan.

“When we open a bathroom door and find a client who has turned blue, it’s an emotional experience,” Sullivan said. “We meet as a team every week … to debrief and create space for healing after these critical incidents. This time allows us to develop protocols for new challenges, and identify what we need to do to care for ourselves and each other so we can continue to respond effectively.”

HEAVY POLICE PRESENCE

City officials have been trying to turn the tide in Bayside.

In 2016, the city launched Bayside Boost, which increased police foot patrols in the neighborhood, and focused on basic quality of life issues such as litter, garbage and street lighting. The initiative was launched a few months before the city put its former Public Works campus in Bayside on the market for redevelopment.

Last summer, the Oxford Street Shelter remained open during the day so people weren’t forced onto the streets. That helped ease some pressure at the resource center.

This spring the city plans to install outdoor restrooms and lockers at the shelter. And city staff act as security guards and patrol the neighborhood wearing bright safety vests.

“The city has done a fantastic job,” said Spinella, the Bayside resident of more than 20 years. “I know nobody wants to believe that.”

Portland police arrest a woman on Oxford Street, near Cedar Street, after she threw a can of beer at an officer, according to witnesses. Her male companion had been arrested moments earlier on a charge of trespassing at the Oxford Street Shelter.

In a written budget request last April to increase staffing, Police Chief Michael Sauschuck said calls for service in Bayside have increased by 71 percent over the last decade, even though it accounts for only 1 percent of the city’s landmass and 5 percent of its population. Service calls for the rest of the peninsula, he said, remained relatively flat.

That statistic shocked Jennifer Ackerman, an assistant district attorney for Cumberland County. She toured the neighborhood last summer with Ray and helped organize another tour with other attorneys and judges.

“I thought that was crazy,” Ackerman said. “One neighborhood was taking up so many resources from the police.”

She singled out the resource center’s low-barrier services as being an aggravating factor.

“The resource center needs to be a good neighbor and put some expectations on people’s behavior,” Ackerman said. “Otherwise, they will walk all over people in the neighborhood.”

Swann said the center does have rules. When they are not followed, people are banned from the center, but that only forces them into the neighborhood. And there is little the nonprofit can do once people leave the building, he said.

“There really is no role for us in that,” Swann said. “We’re not police officers. It’s a significant challenge.”

Bayside Boost, and changes at the city shelter, seem to be making a difference, according to Micheal Bachelder, who has lived on lower Hanover Street for the last 16 years. He thinks increased police attention to so-called hot spots, such as the corner of Hanover and Portland streets near Dyer’s Variety, is having the biggest impact.

Before Bayside Boost, it was not unusual to have 40 to 50 people hanging around at night, he said.

“The police and the city of Portland got together and said they had to do something,” the 67-year-old said. “They’ve been throwing people off that corner. It’s been getting better.”

But even when people are arrested, they are often back on the streets within a few days, where the same temptations await.

A NEW MODEL

The fate of Preble Street’s services in Bayside is inextricably linked to the city shelter. That’s why the nonprofit is beginning to rethink its existence in the neighborhood.

Last year the city changed its zoning to allow emergency shelters in more neighborhoods. Prior to that, shelters could only be located in Bayside.

City officials are now looking to build a more modern facility with about 200 beds to better accommodate clients and city staff. Officials are scouting locations outside of the neighborhood for a new shelter with expanded services, 24 hours a day.

A man sleeps in the doorway of 23 Portland St., a few doors down from the Preble Street Resource Center. The address is part of a block recently purchased by Maine-based T International Realty, which is eyeing redevelopment.

Based on best practices observed in other communities, city officials would like to include many of the services Preble Street provides, such as a soup kitchen, showers, laundry and wrap-around referral services for employment, housing, substance abuse treatment and mental illness. The goal is to give people the support they need to turn their lives around at one facility, rather than spreading those services out.

Swann said his board of directors is already discussing the potential impact on the nonprofit. He’s also in talks with the city about what role, if any, Preble Street could fill at a new shelter, estimated to cost $10 million or more. Swann pointed to the nonprofit’s well-established network of food providers, volunteers and donors.

“We’ve talked to the city about our interest in playing a supportive role in that sense,” Swann said. “Neither party wants to duplicate services. Both parties want to do the right thing. And neither party has a lot of resources.”

In 2014, Preble Street’s nearly 6,000 volunteers served close to 400,000 meals over three courses at the soup kitchen. That year, the resource center furnished about 6,450 loads of laundry and 12,555 showers, according to agency records.

Ray, the city councilor who chairs the Health and Human Services Committee, which is overseeing the city’s shelter relocation project, joined city staff and other councilors on a tour of homeless shelters in Massachusetts in 2016 to explore alternative models. She hopes the city will have a site selected by the end of the year so the planning effort can move forward.

“I always say our staff is so amazing. They help so many people. But the facility we have given them to do this in is not adequate and it does not allow them to put the best practices in place,” Ray said. “That’s why we need a new facility that will offer 24-hour shelter and services on site.”

DEVELOPMENT PRESSURE

For some longtime residents and real estate speculators, a new shelter system outside of Bayside cannot come soon enough.

Such a move would likely transform a neighborhood that’s only a block from Monument Square and has some of the only undeveloped land on the peninsula. This would come at a time when market-rate housing and mixed-used developments are occurring at a pace rivaled only by the rebuilding efforts after the Great Fire of 1866.

Josh Soley is the point man for T International Realty LLC, a group of anonymous investors that recently bought buildings abutting the resource center at 5 Portland St. He said they are “looking to buy everything possible in the area,” including the center, even though Swann says it is not for sale.

The 23-year-old grandson of Joe Soley, who bought blocks of buildings in the Old Port before it became a tourist destination, Josh Soley believes the culture that has grown up around Preble Street is holding the neighborhood back.

“It’s been an eyesore on this entire peninsula,” he said. “And I think with the future movement of the facilities down here – the soup kitchen and the Oxford Street shelter – this area is going to be the future of Portland real estate.”

Meanwhile, one block west of the resource center, the city has been selling off parcels that once comprised its 4-acre public works complex in Bayside.

One project, 23 units of workforce housing by Soley’s uncle, Jack Soley, has already been approved by the Planning Board. And the Szanton Co. recently held a community meeting ahead of submitting plans for a 46-unit apartment building for people ages 55 and older at 178 Kennebec St.

Development activity will inevitably reach Bayside, regardless of whether Preble Street moves, said Paul Peck, president of the Maine Real Estate and Development Association, a trade group of building professionals.

Peck pointed to the addition of 55 units of housing, known as 117 Lofts, in the former Schlotterbeck & Foss building on Preble Street, and the expansion of Bayside Bowl.

That pales in comparison to the hundreds of new housing units on dozens of properties that have been built from the West End and East End in recent years, where new office buildings and hotels are also being planned and built.

Nevertheless, property values in Bayside have continued to increase, despite the neighborhood’s challenges, Peck said.

“There’s a lot of pressure around the city for development and there aren’t a lot of areas left,” he said. “Sometimes areas take longer to develop. Obviously, the resource center and the shelter have an influence down there, and they do great work. But there are (other) impediments to doing development downtown. I think development is going to come either way.”

Swann said he fully supports the city’s exploration of a 24/7 emergency shelter, which could allow Preble Street to refocus its mission at the resource center. For now, he’s waiting for the city to choose a site and finalize a plan – a process that will likely take years.

“The challenge is kind of the waiting, the uncertainty and the extraordinary politics that is going to play out as this progresses,” Swann said. “There’s absolutely an opportunity to rethink what we do at the resource center, how we do it and for whom.”

Staff Photographer Ben McCanna contributed to this report.

Source Article


Visit to Learn More: http://www.correfarmaceutico.com/bayside-at-rock-bottom-portland-neighborhood-is-under-siege/

Tuesday 24 April 2018

USS Portland commissioned in namesake city

The crowd looks on during the commissioning ceremony for USS Portland (LPD 27). (U.S. Army/Staff Sgt. Zach Holden)

PORTLAND, Ore. – During an official commissioning ceremony held in front of over 5,000 guests, the crew of the USS Portland (LPD 27) brought their ship to life, April 21.

The Honorable Patrick Shanahan, deputy secretary of defense, officially placed the Portland in commission, the 11th San Antonio-class amphibious transport dock ship to join the Navy’s operational fleet.

“The City of Roses has a ship worthy of its creative spirit and industrious heritage,” proclaimed Shanahan. “The acceptance trials are over and her officers and crew are ready. Wherever her flag flies, in foreign ports, on the high seas, in weather fair or foul, this ship will carry the spirit of this city on the Columbia River.” While addressing the audience, Shanahan emphasized the importance behind the naming of the Portland, while touching upon the history of the first two ships to carry the name Portland.

“This is the first ship to be named exclusively for Portland, Oregon,” said Shanahan. “Her officers and crew will write the next chapter, and do so with pride. This ship will carry our power and goodwill anywhere they are needed.”

Since departing Pascagoula, Miss. the ship and her crew have sailed 9,930 nautical miles, conducted a crossing the line ceremony, and sailed through the historic Panama Canal on their way to their designated homeport of San Diego.

“Since Dec. 1775, commissioning ceremonies have been an honored naval tradition celebrating, accepting, and welcoming a new ship into the fleet,” said Capt. J. R. Hill, Portland’s commanding officer. “When USS Portland was brought to life during today’s ceremony, I was humbled as I thought back to the dedication and passion the crew demonstrated throughout our journey to this culminating moment.”

Speaking on behalf of the Chief of Naval Operations (CNO) Adm. John Richardson, deputy CNO Vice Adm. Dixon Smith went down memory lane, recalling the history of the Oregon Shipyard, which during the height of World War II launched 24 ships in only 30 days.

“The USS Portland has joined the ever growing list of reasons for Portlanders to be proud,” said Smith. “The men and women of this crew come from all across the nation and will soon sail, perhaps into harm’s way, to keep us safe here at home.” Upon conclusion of the ceremony, guests were invited to tour the 684-foot war fighting vessel, where they could experience the state of the art design that will continue to sail decades from today with future generations of Sailors and Marines aboard. “Portland’s motto, ‘First Responders, Brave and Determined’ made having the ceremony in Portland — with the city’s first responders present — even more meaningful for all in attendance,” said Hill.

Prior to commissioning, Portland underwent multiple phases to prepare her join the fleet.

The ship’s formal recognition of transition from concept to reality began Aug. 2, 2013 at Huntington Ingalls Shipbuilding during the keel laying ceremony when the ship’s sponsor, Bonnie Amos, engraved her name upon a plaque, as a symbol authenticating the keel.

A mast stepping ceremony was then held May 20, 2016. This time-honored naval tradition symbolizes the moment a shell becomes a ship, and her crew honors that tradition by placing mementos into a time capsule for future Portland Sailors to discover.

Portland was officially launched May 21, 2016 after a ceremonial christening was held Feb. 13, 2016.

Today, Portland boasts a heavy arsenal of capabilities beneath the hood. Amphibious transport dock ships are versatile players in maritime security with the ability to support a variety of amphibious assault, special operations or expeditionary warfare missions, operating independently or as part of amphibious ready group (ARGs), expeditionary strike groups (ESGs), or joint task forces (JTFs). In addition to performing their primary mission, the San Antonio-class ships support anti-piracy operations, provide humanitarian assistance, and foreign disaster relief operations around the world.

Sailors run to man USS Portland (LPD 27) during the ceremony. (U.S. Army/Staff Sgt. Zach Holden)

Source Article


Visit to Learn More: http://www.correfarmaceutico.com/uss-portland-commissioned-in-namesake-city/

Wednesday 11 April 2018

Prosper Portland picks Continuum Partners to oversee Broadway Corridor development – Portland Business Journal

A Denver-based developer will likely head up one of the most prominent development projects in all of Portland.

Prosper Portland is expected to select Continuum Partners LLC as the preferred development partner to lead the development of the 32-acre Broadway Corridor, which includes the 14-acre post office site at 715 N.W. Hoyt St. and several other nearby properties.

Based in Denver, Continuum describes itself as "a national leader in large scale, mixed-use, urban projects." The company’s list of projects includes everything from apartments and hotels to new neighborhood districts. Continuum also served as the master developer on the $500 million Denver Union Station Transit Center redevelopment. That 14-year project is credited with spurring as much as $2 billion worth of development, including hotels, offices, shops and restaurants, hotels and apartments and condominiums.

"This is a huge project and this is a big decision," said Kyra Straussman, director of development and investment for Prosper Portland.

Back in November, Prosper Portland issued a request for qualifications looking for developers who had the experience to head up the long-term planning and development effort for Broadway Corridor. The list was narrowed to three finalists in March, including Continuum, a team headed up by McWhinney — also a Denver company — and the New York based Related Companies.

Prosper Portland officials, city partners and a 43-member steering committee vetted the finalists and wound up choosing Continuum. Prosper Portland commissioners will consider the recommendation of Continuum at its meeting on Wednesday.

At the same meeting, Prosper Portland is also expected to approve a $2.1 million contract with ZGF Architects for consulting over the next 16 months on a master plan for the Broadway Corridor project.

Straussman said that Continuum rose to the top of the list over the other finalists despite the fact that the developer’s pitch didn’t include local partners. McWhinney’s submission listed the James Beard Public Market and TEDx Portland among its local team members; it was also working with local developer Beam Development. Related Companies’ team included Melvin Mark Companies and Central City Concern.

"Some folks felt very positively and warmly about the teams that put together the local partners," Straussman said. "Continuum took a totally different tack and said we see ourselves at the beginning of initiating a partnership with you. Some liked that more open-ended approach that Continuum brought."

The selection of Continuum will find the developer negotiating a memorandum of understanding with Prosper Portland. No money will change hands, but Straussman said Continuum did have to make a commitment of their own funds for pre-development in its submission.

The developer also had to be willing to enter a community benefit agreement as part of the qualification process. Such agreements require developers to provide certain benefits or amenities to local communities.

Continuum, ZGF and other subcontractors will work on developing the master plan for Broadway Corridor over the next 16 months. The resulting plan, according to Straussman, will be "a definition of our aspirations for the development of all the properties that are in the Broadway Corridor." It will also size up transit options, housing, public amenities and a host of other considerations.

An initial framework plan for Broadway Corridor, developed in 2015, envisioned 4 million square feet of mixed-use space on the post office site alone. Development of the post office property, according to the original Broadway Corridor RFQ, is expected to generate more than $1 billion in development value and investment.

Prosper Portland’s earlier framework plan for the corridor also envisioned approximately 2,100 new housing units, including 700 that would be affordable.

Straussman said a main goal moving forward on the Broadway Corridor development process will be "radical transparency."

"This project started with active listening at the grass-roots level," she said. "There will be countless portals for folks to give their opinions. It’s an example, not just for Portland but for the whole country, of how you can do large-scale development in a community-driven way."

Source Article


Visit to Learn More: http://www.correfarmaceutico.com/prosper-portland-picks-continuum-partners-to-oversee-broadway-corridor-development-portland-business-journal/

Thursday 29 March 2018

A Look at the Sketchy Practices Inside the Hottest Portland Real Estate Market You’ve Never Heard Of

A Look at the Sketchy Practices Inside the Hottest Portland Real Estate Market You’ve Never Heard Of

A workplace injury cost Davee much of his left arm above the elbow. With his disability, he couldn’t do his job as a diesel mechanic. He began struggling to make the mortgage payments on his three-bedroom, 1969 Milwaukie home near Johnson Creek.

Julius Davee (Walker Stockly)

Robbins, 36, is the king of Portland-area foreclosures. He runs Vantage Homes, a California-based company that has bought and sold hundreds of Oregon homes since the last housing market crash.

After Davee went into foreclosure, a Vantage employee called him with a proposition: Robbins’ company would pay him up to $2,500 to sign a few papers before the sheriff’s auction.

Davee, 76, says he’d never heard of redemption rights. And he had no idea those rights, granted by Oregon law, allowed him to "redeem" or repurchase his home within 180 days after it was sold in a foreclosure auction—by paying whatever price the house sold for at auction, plus interest.

Vantage Homes offered him $300 for his redemption rights—and another $2,200 if Vantage bought the house at auction.

Davee signed the deal on July 1, 2016. Eleven months later, a Robbins-controlled company did buy Davee’s house at auction, paying $183,200.

Sean Robbins, owner of Vantage Homes. Vantage bought Davee’s redemption rights, but another Robbins company bought Davee’s home. (Real Estate Investor Stories youtube)

"I haven’t gotten a dime of it," Davee says. "From what I can find out, the guy [Robbins] put it in another company’s name. He’s a shady dealer."

By buying Davee’s redemption rights for just $300, Robbins controlled a home worth at least 600 times that amount for nearly a year, discouraging anybody else from buying it.

As for Davee, he became the victim of a practice virtually unknown outside a tight circle of real estate investors. It’s entirely legal and essential for controlling the supply of foreclosed homes, which has dwindled as the real estate market has soared.

Foreclosure auctions have lately been the largest source of single-family homes in Portland’s red-hot housing market—and in some years, they outnumber the construction of new homes.

What’s never been reported, however, is the murky trade in redemption rights, a market that has exploded even as the number of foreclosures has declined. For Robbins and other flippers, redemption rights are the means of controlling a precious commodity. Recent transactions in Multnomah County have ranged from as much as $20,000 to as little as $200, with the latter figure much more common.

Critics say the market for redemption rights almost never results in the intended outcome—allowing foreclosed homeowners one last chance to reclaim their properties.

"There’s no social utility to the trade in redemption rights," says Ian Shearer, a Portland consumer lawyer. "There’s such an imbalance in knowledge between the buyer and seller. It’s like going to a garage sale and buying a Monet for a dollar. Is the person who buys it a criminal or a genius? I guess it depends on how you look at it."

Potential bidders at a March 13 Multnomah County sheriff’s foreclosure auction. (Sara Danya is seated to the far right.) The rules require successful bidders to pay on the spot with a cashier’s check. (Sam Gehrke)

At the civil process office, Portlanders can do three things: obtain concealed handgun licenses, register as sex offenders, or buy cheap homes. It’s where banks auction foreclosed properties.

Regular citizens don’t have much of a chance there. On a recent rainy Tuesday, Sarah Danya sat scribbling notes at a Formica-topped table under flickering fluorescent lights as a dozen potential flippers congregated.

In a room of burly men in Carhartts, weathered sports fleeces and paint-spattered clothing, the wiry Danya stood out in her bike polo T-shirt and knee socks that read "Fuck Nazis."

Danya, 28, is a health care worker who wanted to learn about foreclosures. She grew up in Los Angeles, in a home her parents bought at auction. She hoped to follow in their footsteps.

Danya and others were there for the auction of a foreclosed home in North Portland. The bidding started at $209,000 and proceeded first in $100, then $1,000 increments to $258,000. Two of the bidders, obvious pros, communicated on phones to money men elsewhere.

When the winner, Hector Hassen, stepped to the auctioneer’s lectern with a cashier’s check for the full amount, one of the losing bidders issued an ominous warning: "We own the rights to that house," he told Hassen, meaning his company had bought the redemption rights earlier and could take the house away from Hassen any time in the next 180 days.

Hector Hassen (in blue) outbid the two auction regulars (to his right) for a North Portland home on March 13. The lender opened the bidding at $207,578.84. Hassen paid $258,000.(Sam Gehrke)

A fastidious semi-retired gas station owner, Hassen, 69, has bought "a few" foreclosures over the years. He says he refuses on principle to buy rights, even if that means waiting six months to begin renovations—to see if speculators will decide the house is valuable enough to exercise their redemption rights.

Hassen says flippers have made redemption rights a business, often acquiring them for a few hundred dollars then trying to get foreclosure buyers like him to pay 10 times that amount—or more.

Foreclosure auction (Sam Gehrke)

As the housing market stayed strong, more flippers entered the trade for redemption rights, expanding the market from a few transactions in 2013 to hundreds in Multnomah County alone last year.

And he’s not shy. "Vantage is known for paying top dollar to homeowners who are in a position to sell their redemption rights," his company’s website says.

In the email, Robbins says the market for redemption rights provides an indisputable benefit. "The sale of redemption rights gives homeowners who otherwise want to walk away from their homes a chance to get some money out of an already terrible situation," he writes in the email.

Bill and Tammy Linn (Walker Stockly)

A youthful photography aficionado, Linn, 51, built a public relations career defending the makers of violent video games, including Grand Theft Auto. A couple of years ago, he sold his business and a 33-acre gentleman’s farm near Eugene and moved to Portland. He and his wife, Tammy, 52, don’t think of themselves as flippers, but they enjoy fixing up houses.

The Linns bought the property at a sheriff’s auction for $185,000. "We thought, ‘Hey, we just got a hell of a deal,’" Linn recalls.

At a sheriff’s auction, Bill and Tammy Linn got a home (above) and an education. “The redemption rights process screws sellers and totally games the system,” Bill Linn says.(Courtesy of Bill and Tammy Linn)
(Courtesy of Bill and Tammy Linn)

"He said, ‘The rights cost me $500,’" Linn recalls. "’If you give me $5,000 [for those rights], you can start work tomorrow.’" Otherwise, Linn would have to wait 180 days because Robbins could exercise his redemption rights during that time and keep the value of any improvements Linn made.

(Courtesy of Bill and Tammy Linn)

Then, nothing happened. Reilly wouldn’t start fixing the house up because Robbins’ company owned the redemption rights. Finally, records show, 171 days after the auction, Robbins’ company exercised those rights, taking the house away from Care. (Had Reilly invested, say, $25,000 in remodeling the house, Robbins could have bought the house for the auction price and paid nothing for the improvements Reilly had made.) Flippers would generally prefer not to exercise redemption rights because doing so restores any pre-existing liens, such as property taxes or second mortgages, that otherwise get wiped out in a foreclosure auction.

The owner, Mathilde Danzinger, had paid $207,400 for the condo in 2006. Now, it was headed to a foreclosure auction.

Foreclosure auction (Sam Gehrke)

But just seven days after recording the purchase of Danzinger’s redemption rights, records show, Vantage sold those rights to another company for $10,000—a 50-fold return on Vantage’s investment.

That flipper profited as well, buying Danzinger’s condo at auction for $151,000 in September 2017 and selling it for $235,000 just four months later.

The girl’s step-grandfather, Paul Allman, 72, says he began negotiating with Vantage Homes. "We were talking about something in the $15,000 range," Allman recalls.

Julius Davee thought he was getting $2,500 for his redemption rights. He got $300. (Walker Stockly)

There are two common types of property foreclosures: judicial and nonjudicial. During and after the great recession that began in 2007, foreclosures skyrocketed because many homeowners had taken on mortgages they could not pay, a problem that worsened as property values tanked.

June 23, 2017: Vantage legally transfers the redemption rights to Sean John, so Sean John will have clean title to the home.

Sponsored

Source Article


Visit to Learn More: http://www.correfarmaceutico.com/a-look-at-the-sketchy-practices-inside-the-hottest-portland-real-estate-market-youve-never-heard-of/